OKC

2025-26 Season

JALEN WILLIAMS

Oklahoma City Thunder | Guard-Forward | 6-5
Jalen Williams
17.1 PPG
4.6 RPG
5.5 APG
28.4 MPG
+6.5 Impact

Williams produces at an elite rate for a 28-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+6.5
Scoring +14.8
Points 17.1 PPG = +11.7
Shot Making above expected FG% = +3.1
Creation +1.7
Creation 5.5 AST/g = +1.7
Turnovers -4.3
Turnovers 1.9/g = -4.3
Defense +1.3
Defense 1.2 STL, 0.3 BLK = +1.3
Hustle & Effort +2.8
Rebounds 4.6 RPG = +2.8
Raw Impact +16.3
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.8
Net Impact
+6.5
83th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 245 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 83th
17.1 PPG
Efficiency 65th
56.7% TS
Playmaking 86th
5.5 APG
Rebounding 84th
4.6 RPG
Defense 66th
+8.9/g
Hustle 41th
+7.9/g
Creation 84th
+4.22/g
Shot Making 59th
+7.04/g
TO Discipline 32th
0.07/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

A maddening inconsistency defined Jalen Williams's early-season stretch, bouncing wildly between two-way brilliance and inefficient shot-chucking. Sometimes his sheer motor salvaged ugly offensive nights, perfectly illustrated on 11/28 vs PHX. Despite scoring just 11 points on a brutal 3-for-12 from the floor, he still posted a +3.2 impact score by shifting his focus to high-level playmaking and stifling perimeter defense (+5.4). When his interior touch actually clicked, he was an absolute wrecking ball, peaking on 12/07 vs UTA with 25 points and a massive +21.9 impact driven by elite downhill finishing. Yet, hidden costs frequently sabotaged his overall value even when the box score looked decent. During a grueling 41-minute shift on 01/07 vs UTA, a heavy reliance on contested jumpers and poor three-point execution dragged him down to a miserable -7.8 impact despite tallying 17 points and 8 assists. He clearly possesses the physical tools to bend opposing defenses, but his stubborn shot selection remains a glaring hurdle.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Very consistent. Williams posts positive impact in 85% of games — you almost always get a productive night. Scoring varies by ~5 points, but the overall contribution stays positive.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 61% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Williams consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Hot right now — 5 straight games with positive impact. Longest positive run this season: 17 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 30 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

D. Fox 87.1 poss
FG% 45.5%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 14
C. Coward 43.7 poss
FG% 31.2%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 11
R. O'Neale 43.2 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 8
D. Brooks 41.0 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.44
PTS 18
K. Murray 37.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 8
S. Castle 35.5 poss
FG% 30.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 9
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 8
S. Mykhailiuk 30.1 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 8
J. Goodwin 30.0 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 8
A. Edwards 28.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 4

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

D. Brooks 63.1 poss
FG% 46.2%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.27
PTS 17
R. O'Neale 57.0 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 75.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 11
V. Wembanyama 55.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 14
S. Castle 52.9 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 13
A. Wiggins 38.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 7
J. Jackson Jr. 33.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 6
P. George 32.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
K. George 30.7 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 7
R. Hachimura 29.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
L. Markkanen 28.9 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.35
PTS 10

SEASON STATS

33
Games
17.1
PPG
4.6
RPG
5.5
APG
1.2
SPG
0.3
BPG
48.4
FG%
29.9
3P%
83.7
FT%
28.4
MPG

GAME LOG

33 games played