CHI

2025-26 Season

JALEN SMITH

Chicago Bulls | Forward-Center | 6-8
Jalen Smith
10.3 PPG
6.7 RPG
1.2 APG
20.6 MPG
+1.1 Impact

Smith produces at an above average rate for a 21-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+1.1
Scoring +9.1
Points 10.3 PPG = +6.9
Shot Making above expected FG% = +2.2
Creation +0.6
Creation 1.2 AST/g = +0.6
Turnovers -2.4
Turnovers 1.0/g = -2.4
Defense -0.9
Defense 0.4 STL, 0.8 BLK = -0.9
Hustle & Effort +5.9
Rebounds 6.7 RPG = +5.9
Raw Impact +12.3
Baseline (game-average expected) −11.2
Net Impact
+1.1
60th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 234 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 58th
10.3 PPG
Efficiency 84th
61.9% TS
Playmaking 31th
1.2 APG
Rebounding 86th
6.7 RPG
Defense 32th
+6.0/g
Hustle 74th
+15.2/g
Creation 47th
+2.28/g
Shot Making 31th
+4.39/g
TO Discipline 44th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Jalen Smith’s first 20 games were a wildly volatile experiment in backup big-man minutes, oscillating between dominant paint enforcement and disastrous perimeter chucking. When he embraced his physical tools, he was a massive plus. Look at his flawless performance on 11/08 vs CLE, where he poured in 18 points and 11 rebounds on perfect 6-of-6 shooting to generate a staggering +16.4 impact score through dominant interior positioning. Yet, when he drifted away from his core strengths, his overall value plummeted. During the 11/04 vs PHI matchup, a surprising 14-point scoring outburst masked a complete lack of defensive resistance, dragging his impact down to a -3.9 as opponents easily bypassed him. Conversely, he found ways to contribute positively even when his offensive volume vanished. On 11/19 vs POR, Smith managed just 5 points but still posted a +3.7 impact score by providing a sturdy physical presence and altering crucial shots at the rim. He clearly thrives as an energy big, but his defensive lapses and occasional shot-selection woes keep his nightly reliability firmly capped.

This stretch was defined by a chaotic tug-of-war between Smith's burgeoning role as a starting frontcourt anchor and his maddeningly inconsistent perimeter jumper. When he embraced his interior physicality, he simply bullied opponents. During a start on 12/31 vs NOP, he grabbed 14 rebounds and altered shots in the paint to drive a massive +8.3 impact score. Conversely, poor shot selection frequently sabotaged his own high-energy effort. On 01/13 vs HOU, a disastrous 0-for-5 night from deep completely erased the value of his 14 points and nine boards, dragging him down to a brutal -7.9 impact rating. He finally found the perfect equilibrium on 02/03 vs MIL, stretching the floor by hitting 3-of-5 threes to warp the opposing defense. That lethal combination of frontcourt spacing and aggressive rim protection yielded an elite +8.4 impact score, revealing exactly the type of two-way ceiling he possesses when his perimeter trigger matches his undeniable hustle.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Smith's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~4 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 63% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Smith consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: -0.9, second-half: +3.1. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 7 games. Longest cold streak: 5 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 56 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

K. Towns 46.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 37.5%
PPP 0.28
PTS 13
Y. Missi 42.8 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.12
PTS 5
S. Bey 34.2 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 6
L. James 33.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Duren 33.6 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.21
PTS 7
C. Murray-Boyles 33.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.3
PTS 10
J. Smith Jr. 32.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 7
G. Bitadze 31.8 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.31
PTS 10
A. Bona 29.5 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.2
PTS 6
J. Randle 28.0 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 6

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

K. Towns 54.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 10
N. Claxton 44.7 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 6
J. Smith Jr. 44.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.11
PTS 5
Y. Missi 37.2 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 6
D. Ayton 36.6 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 8
C. Murray-Boyles 36.2 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 6
L. James 35.9 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 4
G. Bitadze 35.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 4
A. Sengun 35.5 poss
FG% 88.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.48
PTS 17
J. Duren 35.1 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 6

SEASON STATS

54
Games
10.3
PPG
6.7
RPG
1.2
APG
0.4
SPG
0.8
BPG
48.8
FG%
37.6
3P%
74.2
FT%
20.6
MPG

GAME LOG

54 games played