TOR

2025-26 Season

JAKOB POELTL

Toronto Raptors | Center | 7-0
Jakob Poeltl
10.6 PPG
7.0 RPG
2.0 APG
24.9 MPG
+4.9 Impact

Poeltl produces at an above average rate for a 25-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+4.9
Scoring +10.3
Points 10.6 PPG = +8.6
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.7
Creation +0.6
Creation 2.0 AST/g = +0.6
Turnovers -3.1
Turnovers 1.3/g = -3.1
Defense -0.8
Defense 0.9 STL, 0.7 BLK = -0.8
Hustle & Effort +7.2
Rebounds 7.0 RPG = +7.2
Raw Impact +14.2
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.3
Net Impact
+4.9
65th pctl vs Centers

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 93 Centers with 10+ games

Scoring 58th
10.6 PPG
Efficiency 92th
69.0% TS
Playmaking 72th
2.0 APG
Rebounding 62th
7.0 RPG
Defense 25th
+4.7/g
Hustle 81th
+22.9/g
Creation 56th
+2.46/g
Shot Making 41th
+3.89/g
TO Discipline 47th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Jakob Poeltl’s early season was defined by ruthless interior efficiency and defensive anchoring. He morphed into an advanced-metrics juggernaut when operating strictly around the basket. On 11/13 vs CLE, he dropped 20 points on 7/10 shooting, generating a massive +18.1 impact score through highly disciplined shot selection and clinical finishing. Even when his scoring vanished, his non-scoring value kept his team afloat. During the 11/29 vs CHA matchup, he managed just 8 points but still posted a +8.1 impact because he dictated the game with 11 rebounds and elite post playmaking that yielded 9 assists. However, his heavy-footed drop coverage occasionally became a glaring liability. On 10/24 vs MIL, he was completely out-leveraged by quicker bigs in the pick-and-roll, resulting in a brutal -6.3 impact score. Ultimately, as long as he maintained his positional discipline, his sheer physical presence dictated the terms of engagement in the paint.

This twenty-game stretch transformed Jakob Poeltl from a passive bench piece into an irreplaceable interior anchor. Things actually started disastrously on 02/19 vs CHI, where he posted a miserable -8.4 impact score as a reserve due to complete invisibility on the glass and zero rim pressure. He quickly reclaimed his starting job and flipped the script, generating a massive +11.9 impact on 02/22 vs MIL despite scoring just six points. That immense value came entirely from flawless defensive anchoring and elite rim protection that completely suffocated the opposition. Conversely, raw scoring volume occasionally masked severe hidden costs. During a 23-point, 11-rebound outburst on 03/20 vs DEN, his overall impact settled at a modest +4.0 because his usually stout interior presence completely collapsed, yielding a disastrous -12.7 defensive score. When engaged, Poeltl was a hyper-efficient battering ram, but his true value always hinged strictly on his defensive discipline rather than his point totals.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Volatile for his role. Poeltl has noticeable ups and downs, with scoring moving ~6 points between games.

Reliable shooter — hits 45%+ from the field in 92% of games. You can count on efficient nights more often than not.

Defensive difference-maker. Poeltl consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: +3.0, second-half: +6.8. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

In a rough stretch — 4 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 4 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 41 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

R. Kalkbrenner 102.3 poss
FG% 68.8%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 23
J. Duren 83.5 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 17
K. Porziņģis 65.1 poss
FG% 87.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 14
M. Turner 62.7 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 6
K. Towns 56.9 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 8
I. Jackson 49.1 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 8
A. Drummond 45.1 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 12
R. Gobert 38.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 7
V. Wembanyama 37.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 8
N. Queta 36.1 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 8

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

R. Kalkbrenner 106.9 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 12
J. Duren 72.2 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 22
K. Porziņģis 60.9 poss
FG% 31.2%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 15
M. Turner 56.2 poss
FG% 45.5%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 13
A. Drummond 46.2 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.04
PTS 2
I. Jackson 44.9 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 6
K. Towns 42.4 poss
FG% 58.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.4
PTS 17
B. Adebayo 37.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 6
N. Claxton 37.0 poss
FG% 55.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 11
V. Wembanyama 34.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 4

SEASON STATS

47
Games
10.6
PPG
7.0
RPG
2.0
APG
0.9
SPG
0.7
BPG
69.9
FG%
0.0
3P%
61.0
FT%
24.9
MPG

GAME LOG

47 games played