DET

2025-26 Season

ISAIAH STEWART

Detroit Pistons | Forward-Center | 6-8
Isaiah Stewart
10.0 PPG
5.0 RPG
1.1 APG
22.7 MPG
+0.9 Impact

Stewart produces at an average rate for a 23-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+0.9
Scoring +9.1
Points 10.0 PPG = +7.4
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.7
Creation +0.7
Creation 1.1 AST/g = +0.7
Turnovers -2.8
Turnovers 1.2/g = -2.8
Defense -0.9
Defense 0.3 STL, 1.6 BLK = -0.9
Hustle & Effort +4.6
Rebounds 5.0 RPG = +4.6
Raw Impact +10.7
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.8
Net Impact
+0.9
57th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 234 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 55th
10.0 PPG
Efficiency 90th
63.8% TS
Playmaking 26th
1.1 APG
Rebounding 63th
5.0 RPG
Defense 5th
+2.9/g
Hustle 84th
+16.8/g
Creation 40th
+2.07/g
Shot Making 56th
+6.20/g
TO Discipline 41th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Isaiah Stewart's early season was defined by extreme volatility, oscillating wildly between dominant interior bully-ball and spacing-killing offensive limitations. When his physical brand of basketball clicked, he was an absolute monster. Look no further than the 11/03 vs MEM matchup, where he battered his way to 26 points and 14 rebounds. His towering +21.9 impact score in that contest stemmed directly from sheer interior dominance and high-value shot creation that overwhelmed the defense. Conversely, his limitations frequently dragged down lineups when his jumper failed him. During a dismal showing on 10/24 vs HOU, Stewart posted a brutal -7.8 impact score because his complete lack of offensive gravity allowed his primary defender to mercilessly roam and clog the paint. Yet, he still managed to salvage value on nights when his scoring completely vanished. On 12/03 vs MIL, he managed just 5 points but still generated a stellar +5.9 impact simply by utilizing his imposing physical frame to deter shots at the rim and anchor the defense.

This twenty-game stretch was a volatile tug-of-war between Isaiah Stewart's bruising interior defense and his wildly inconsistent offensive spacing. Look at his 12/26 vs UTA performance, where hesitant perimeter shooting completely bogged down the half-court offense and dragged him to a brutal -10.0 impact score. Yet, his elite physical drop coverage often salvaged his overall value on quiet scoring nights. During the 01/05 vs NYK matchup, he managed a positive +0.6 impact despite scoring just seven points because his relentless defensive activity and rebounding locked down the paint. When he actually found his rhythm inside, the results were devastating. He erupted for 31 points on 14-of-17 shooting on 01/07 vs CHI, ruthlessly punishing mismatches through contact to generate a massive +22.6 impact score. Ultimately, Stewart remains a situational battering ram whose nightly effectiveness hinges entirely on whether his jumper commands enough respect to keep the floor unclogged.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Stewart's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~6 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 61% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Stewart consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 6 games. Longest cold streak: 5 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 62 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

B. Adebayo 74.9 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 10
N. Vučević 63.0 poss
FG% 56.2%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 18
E. Mobley 53.9 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 4
J. Johnson 49.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 9
K. Ware 49.8 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 7
O. Ighodaro 48.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 7
J. Nurkić 47.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.17
PTS 8
O. Okongwu 47.1 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 12
D. Sharpe 43.9 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
M. Robinson 41.9 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 6

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

B. Adebayo 94.7 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 11
N. Vučević 70.2 poss
FG% 45.0%
3P% 42.9%
PPP 0.3
PTS 21
E. Mobley 57.4 poss
FG% 36.4%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.21
PTS 12
J. Johnson 51.3 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.21
PTS 11
D. Sharpe 45.5 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 3
J. Sims 45.2 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 6
M. Robinson 45.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
O. Okongwu 43.4 poss
FG% 58.3%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.39
PTS 17
O. Ighodaro 42.5 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 8
D. Cardwell 41.2 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 5

SEASON STATS

58
Games
10.0
PPG
5.0
RPG
1.1
APG
0.3
SPG
1.6
BPG
55.0
FG%
33.3
3P%
75.6
FT%
22.7
MPG

GAME LOG

58 games played