CHI

2025-26 Season

ISAAC OKORO

Chicago Bulls | Forward-Guard | 6-4
Isaac Okoro
9.2 PPG
2.7 RPG
1.6 APG
26.8 MPG
-2.3 Impact

Okoro produces at an below average rate for a 27-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-2.3
Scoring +7.8
Points 9.2 PPG = +5.9
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.9
Creation +0.6
Creation 1.6 AST/g = +0.6
Turnovers -1.8
Turnovers 0.7/g = -1.8
Defense -0.3
Defense 0.8 STL, 0.5 BLK = -0.3
Hustle & Effort +2.5
Rebounds 2.7 RPG = +2.5
Raw Impact +8.8
Baseline (game-average expected) −11.1
Net Impact
-2.3
38th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 234 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 50th
9.2 PPG
Efficiency 38th
55.3% TS
Playmaking 51th
1.6 APG
Rebounding 17th
2.7 RPG
Defense 57th
+7.6/g
Hustle 15th
+7.6/g
Creation 33th
+1.88/g
Shot Making 26th
+4.13/g
TO Discipline 93th
0.03/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Isaac Okoro’s first twenty games were defined by a maddening offensive hesitancy that frequently sabotaged his defensive utility. While he occasionally found a rhythm, his inability to stretch the floor often left his team playing four-on-five in the half-court. Look no further than his 11/02 vs NYK performance, where he tallied 14 points but still posted a dismal -6.6 impact score. That negative rating was driven entirely by hidden mistakes, as a string of costly fouls and live-ball turnovers completely erased his scoring contributions. The floor-spacing issues reached their absolute nadir on 11/10 vs SAS. He finished with just 2 points and a catastrophic -14.6 impact score because his inability to hit wide-open corner attempts allowed defenders to completely abandon him and pack the paint. Yet, he occasionally found ways to survive his own offensive limitations, like on 12/19 vs CLE. Despite scoring a mere 3 points, he scraped out a +0.4 impact score by leaning heavily on elite point-of-attack ball pressure to salvage an otherwise dormant outing.

Isaac Okoro's midseason stretch was defined by maddening offensive inconsistency that frequently sabotaged his elite physical tools. When he actually found his rhythm, he was a two-way terror, erupting for 24 points on 8-of-10 shooting on 12/31 vs NOP to generate a massive +8.9 impact score through ruthless efficiency. Even when his shot disappeared, he could occasionally swing a game through sheer willpower. On 01/16 vs BKN, he managed just 6 points but still posted a +4.6 impact because his suffocating point-of-attack defense and relentless hustle completely locked down the perimeter. Yet, those defensive instincts inexplicably abandoned him on 01/14 vs UTA. Despite scoring a respectable 12 points in that matchup, poor closeouts and blown defensive assignments severely punished his team, dragging his impact down to a dismal -8.7. Ultimately, Okoro remains a volatile specialist whose overall value wildly fluctuates depending on whether he is hitting open shots or completely vanishing into the background.

This stretch was defined by a maddening tug-of-war between Isaac Okoro's relentless point-of-attack defense and his completely broken offensive game. Even when he found the bottom of the net, hidden costs ruined his overall value. During a 15-point outing on 02/21 vs DET, subtle defensive breakdowns in transition dragged his impact down to a disappointing -0.2. The floor completely fell out shortly after on 03/03 vs OKC. He scored just 4 points and posted a disastrous -16.3 impact score while shooting a miserable 1-for-9 from the field, acting as an offensive black hole that allowed defenders to ignore him entirely. Yet, his utility occasionally surfaced without him needing to carry a scoring load. On 04/03 vs NYK, he managed just 7 points but still posted a +3.1 impact because his relentless effort on loose balls and suffocating perimeter defense completely disrupted the opposition. He remains a wildly frustrating rotation piece whose defensive grit is too often erased by poor floor spacing.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Okoro's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~5 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 55% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Okoro locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Slight upward trend. First-half impact: -3.2, second-half: -1.5. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 4 games. Longest cold streak: 7 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 66 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

D. Robinson 91.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.02
PTS 2
J. Brunson 69.0 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 8
T. Young 54.2 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 4
B. Ingram 50.5 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.2
PTS 10
A. Green 45.0 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.22
PTS 10
D. Bane 41.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
D. Mitchell 41.4 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 8
J. Grant 38.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.03
PTS 1
L. Ball 38.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4
D. Garland 38.3 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

D. Robinson 79.7 poss
FG% 58.3%
3P% 77.8%
PPP 0.26
PTS 21
J. Brunson 67.9 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 4
C. Cunningham 61.8 poss
FG% 30.0%
3P% 30.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 17
T. Maxey 58.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 9
D. Mitchell 56.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.23
PTS 13
J. Johnson 49.5 poss
FG% 53.8%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.38
PTS 19
Z. Williamson 47.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 11
J. Murray 47.0 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 10
N. Clowney 47.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.11
PTS 5
M. Porter Jr. 45.5 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 11

SEASON STATS

64
Games
9.2
PPG
2.7
RPG
1.6
APG
0.8
SPG
0.5
BPG
46.1
FG%
33.3
3P%
79.5
FT%
26.8
MPG

GAME LOG

64 games played