2025-26 Season
IMMANUEL QUICKLEY
2025-26 Season
IMMANUEL QUICKLEY
PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology
TEAM COMPARISON
of 14 teammates (10+ games, 10+ min)
Similar Players
Same position, closest production profile this season.
SKILL DNA
Percentile rank vs 245 Guards with 10+ games
THE SEASON SO FAR
Immanuel Quickley’s first twenty games were defined by a maddening inconsistency, oscillating wildly between explosive offensive outbursts and brutal volume-shooting slumps. When his mechanics aligned, he was a massive offensive engine, peaking on 11/11 vs BKN where his explosive shot creation drove a stellar +12.2 impact score. Yet, his heavy usage frequently yielded diminishing returns. During the 11/29 vs CHA matchup, Quickley stuffed the box score with 22 points and 10 assists, but his inefficient perimeter shooting dragged his overall impact down to a -0.3. His defensive engagement also fluctuated dramatically. On 11/02 vs MEM, he managed just 9 points and suffered a disastrous -11.1 impact score because he repeatedly died on ball screens, exposing the defensive backline. For every masterful orchestration of the offense, there was a night where erratic decision-making and forced perimeter looks completely cratered his value.
This twenty-game stretch was defined by maddening inconsistency, with Immanuel Quickley oscillating violently between offensive mastery and self-destructive habits. When he dialed in his decision-making, he was untouchable. He orchestrated a pick-and-roll masterclass on 12/05 vs CHA, punishing under-screens to generate 31 points and a massive +14.3 impact score. Yet, far too often, his gaudy scoring totals masked deep underlying flaws. Look no further than 12/28 vs GSW, where he poured in 27 points but still posted a -3.0 impact because hidden errors dragged his rating into the red. Conversely, he occasionally found ways to be a net positive when his jumper completely abandoned him. During a brutal 6-for-22 shooting night on 01/11 vs PHI, he managed to grind out a +2.2 impact. Rather than letting his broken perimeter stroke dictate his value, he leaned on phenomenal point-of-attack defense to salvage the evening.
Immanuel Quickley’s midseason stretch was defined by wild, unpredictable pendulum swings between offensive mastery and empty-calorie isolation play. When his jumper was falling, he looked utterly unstoppable, peaking on 01/20 vs GSW with a staggering +22.3 impact score fueled by 40 points, 10 assists, and lethal 7-for-8 perimeter shot-making. Yet, that blistering execution frequently vanished into bouts of selfish ball-stopping. During a brutal 01/28 vs NYK matchup, he managed just 7 points and a disastrous -14.2 impact because he insisted on pounding the air out of the ball and settling for heavily contested pull-ups. Even when his raw scoring totals looked respectable, hidden costs often ruined his actual value on the floor. His 20-point outing on 02/25 vs SAS yielded a -2.5 impact, as his complete lack of playmaking—zero assists in 37 minutes—turned a decent shooting night into classic empty calories that actively bled points. Quickley clearly has the talent to fracture a defensive shell, but his tendency to over-dribble remains a glaring liability.
IMPACT TIMELINE
Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.
Very consistent. Quickley posts positive impact in 84% of games — you almost always get a productive night. Scoring varies by ~7 points, but the overall contribution stays positive.
Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 49% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.
Defensive difference-maker. Quickley consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.
Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: +8.0, second-half: +11.3. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.
Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 16 games. Longest cold streak: 3 games.
MATCHUP HISTORY
Based on 69 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.
ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM
His shooting stats against each primary defender this season
ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED
How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.
SEASON STATS
GAME LOG
70 games played
Don't miss tomorrow's analysis
GET YOUR TEAM'S BREAKDOWN
Free daily analysis with Net Impact player ratings. Delivered every morning after your team plays.
Create Free AccountAlready have one? Log in