POR

2025-26 Season

DUOP REATH

Portland Trail Blazers | Center | 6-9
Duop Reath
2.9 PPG
1.2 RPG
0.3 APG
8.1 MPG
-7.1 Impact

Reath produces at an poor rate for a 8-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-7.1
Scoring +3.0
Points 2.9 PPG = +2.1
Shot Making above expected FG% = +0.9
Creation +0.1
Creation 0.3 AST/g = +0.1
Turnovers -0.6
Turnovers 0.2/g = -0.6
Defense -0.6
Defense 0.2 STL, 0.2 BLK = -0.6
Hustle & Effort +1.1
Rebounds 1.2 RPG = +1.1
Raw Impact +3.0
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.1
Net Impact
-7.1
4th pctl vs Centers

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 93 Centers with 10+ games

Scoring 15th
4.5 PPG
Efficiency 61th
61.4% TS
Playmaking 7th
0.5 APG
Rebounding 2th
1.8 RPG
Defense 15th
+3.2/g
Hustle 3th
+6.3/g
Creation 2th
+0.70/g
Shot Making 38th
+3.79/g
TO Discipline 96th
0.03/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Duop Reath’s first twenty games were defined by the wildly erratic, feast-or-famine reality of being a one-dimensional floor-spacing big. When his outside shot falls, he completely warps opposing coverages. He did exactly that on 11/05 vs OKC, burying four threes for 12 points and generating a massive +5.0 impact score through lethal pick-and-pop execution. However, his lack of physical interior presence constantly threatens to erase his offensive value. Look at his 11/18 vs PHX appearance, where a catastrophic inability to secure the defensive glass resulted in a dismal -5.8 impact score despite logging 10 minutes. Strangely enough, he occasionally found ways to survive without hitting shots at all. On 11/30 vs OKC, Reath managed a +0.9 impact score despite putting up zero points, entirely because his solid defensive positioning kept the team afloat during a brief cameo. Ultimately, he remains a situational luxury who is highly effective when spacing the floor but too fragile on the boards to trust consistently.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Reath has posted negative impact in 88% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 29% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Reath locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 1 games. Longest cold streak: 11 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 48 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

J. Landale 22.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Duren 14.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 4
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
I. Hartenstein 12.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.49
PTS 6
I. Joe 11.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Isaac 10.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Wiggins 9.7 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 3
O. Dieng 9.4 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.43
PTS 4
J. Nurkić 9.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 3
J. Williams 8.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

J. Landale 17.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 4
M. Raynaud 16.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 2
J. Williams 14.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 3
B. Carlson 14.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 2
O. Dieng 12.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
Y. Missi 11.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 3
J. Nurkić 11.8 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.34
PTS 4
M. Gueye 11.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
I. Stewart 11.7 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 2
I. Hartenstein 10.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.37
PTS 4

SEASON STATS

32
Games
2.9
PPG
1.2
RPG
0.3
APG
0.2
SPG
0.2
BPG
44.6
FG%
41.8
3P%
83.3
FT%
8.1
MPG

GAME LOG

32 games played