NOP

2025-26 Season

DERIK QUEEN

New Orleans Pelicans | Center | 6-9
Derik Queen
11.7 PPG
7.1 RPG
3.7 APG
25.0 MPG
+0.9 Impact

Queen produces at an average rate for a 25-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+0.9
Scoring +9.7
Points 11.7 PPG = +7.7
Shot Making above expected FG% = +2.0
Creation +1.6
Creation 3.7 AST/g = +1.6
Turnovers -5.6
Turnovers 2.3/g = -5.6
Defense +0.3
Defense 1.0 STL, 0.9 BLK = +0.3
Hustle & Effort +6.0
Rebounds 7.1 RPG = +6.0
Raw Impact +12.0
Baseline (game-average expected) −11.1
Net Impact
+0.9
44th pctl vs Centers

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 93 Centers with 10+ games

Scoring 66th
11.7 PPG
Efficiency 15th
53.3% TS
Playmaking 93th
3.7 APG
Rebounding 64th
7.1 RPG
Defense 97th
+11.4/g
Hustle 96th
+27.0/g
Creation 97th
+5.57/g
Shot Making 53th
+5.18/g
TO Discipline 4th
0.09/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

A turbulent evolution from a blue-collar bench enforcer into an erratic offensive hub defined Derik Queen's opening twenty games. Early on, he thrived by doing the dirty work, a dynamic perfectly captured on 10/22 vs MEM. He scored a meager 3 points that night, yet still posted a +1.5 impact score because his gritty interior defense and relentless loose-ball pursuit salvaged his floor time. As his offensive usage increased, his desire to hunt his own shot occasionally hurt the team. During the 11/08 vs SAS contest, Queen tallied a solid 13 points but registered a dismal -4.1 impact. A high volume of forced interior looks and poor shot selection completely undercut his value in that matchup, serving as a hidden cost to his scoring bump. Fortunately, he eventually found his rhythm as a starter, erupting for 30 points on 11/19 vs DEN where his elite interior finishing and defensive anchoring drove a massive +19.0 impact score.

This twenty-game stretch was defined by maddening inconsistency, oscillating wildly between historic offensive dominance and frustrating self-sabotage. Queen reached his absolute ceiling on 12/08 vs SAS, erupting for 33 points, 10 rebounds, and 10 assists to post a staggering +14.0 impact score. That massive leap in playmaking completely shattered his previous limits. Yet, he frequently undermined his own value, exactly like he did on 01/04 vs MIA. Despite putting up 13 points and finding a better offensive rhythm, he posted a brutal -9.4 impact score because hidden costs like poorly timed turnovers dragged down his overall effectiveness. Conversely, he occasionally found ways to tilt the floor without scoring much at all, as seen on 01/07 vs ATL. He managed just 6 points in that contest, yet still recorded a +6.0 impact. Relentless hustle and elite interior defense drove that highly positive shift, making him a winning player even when his touch completely abandoned him.

A jarring demotion to the bench and wild swings in nightly effectiveness defined this turbulent stretch for Derik Queen. When his shot abandoned him, he occasionally found ways to salvage his minutes through sheer grit. On 01/27 vs OKC, a phenomenal defensive anchor performance generated a +6.3 impact despite him scoring just 9 points on inefficient interior looks. Conversely, his scoring totals often masked severe fundamental lapses. During the 02/11 vs MIA matchup, Queen managed 12 points but posted a dismal -6.8 impact because opposing bigs easily exploited his defensive porousness. Yet, just before losing his starting job in late February, he delivered an absolute masterclass on 02/20 vs MIL. He racked up 18 points and 9 rebounds, earning a massive +10.1 impact by combining superb rim-running with active hands in the passing lanes.

A chaotic pendulum swing between brilliant high-post playmaking and maddeningly empty shifts defined Derik Queen's late-season stretch. He was a wildly volatile asset off the bench before finally moving into the starting lineup. Look at Apr 07 vs UTA for a perfect example of his hidden flaws. He stuffed the box score with 17 points, 12 rebounds, and 7 assists, yet posted a dismal -8.1 impact score because a rash of illegal screens completely tanked his overall value. Conversely, he barely looked at the basket on Mar 21 vs CLE, scoring just 9 points, but generated a massive +10.3 impact. Operating as a brilliant offensive hub, he picked apart the zone with pinpoint passing while anchoring the floor with exceptional defensive metrics (+10.0 def). He finally merged his raw production with winning habits on Apr 10 vs BOS. Bullying his way to 25 points and 11 rebounds, Queen posted a +9.6 impact driven by dominant two-way execution and flawless defensive positioning.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Queen's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~7 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 52% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Queen consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Small downward trend. First-half impact: +1.8, second-half: -0.0. Not alarming yet, but trending the wrong direction.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 76 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

R. Gobert 104.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 24
J. Landale 95.6 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 19
L. Kornet 73.5 poss
FG% 63.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.41
PTS 30
N. Vučević 58.3 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 6
K. Ware 56.6 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 15
D. Ayton 56.0 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 8
J. Huff 54.9 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 6
M. Raynaud 54.6 poss
FG% 36.4%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 8
D. Daniels 48.3 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 6
D. Gafford 46.2 poss
FG% 55.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 12

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

R. Gobert 99.5 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 23
L. Kornet 83.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 10
D. Ayton 75.3 poss
FG% 63.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.39
PTS 29
K. Ware 57.9 poss
FG% 31.2%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 10
J. Landale 57.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.36
PTS 21
J. Jackson Jr. 53.0 poss
FG% 38.1%
3P% 28.6%
PPP 0.4
PTS 21
M. Raynaud 47.6 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 9
A. Davis 45.6 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.7
PTS 32
D. Gafford 45.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 7
A. Sengun 43.6 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 12

SEASON STATS

81
Games
11.7
PPG
7.1
RPG
3.7
APG
1.0
SPG
0.9
BPG
47.3
FG%
26.1
3P%
79.5
FT%
25.0
MPG

GAME LOG

81 games played