LAC

2025-26 Season

CHRIS PAUL

LA Clippers | Guard | 6-0
Chris Paul
2.9 PPG
1.8 RPG
3.3 APG
14.2 MPG
-8.3 Impact

Paul produces at an poor rate for a 14-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-8.3
Scoring +2.1
Points 2.9 PPG = +1.2
Shot Making above expected FG% = +0.9
Creation +0.5
Creation 3.3 AST/g = +0.5
Turnovers -2.3
Turnovers 1.0/g = -2.3
Defense +0.3
Defense 0.7 STL, 0.0 BLK = +0.3
Hustle & Effort +1.3
Rebounds 1.8 RPG = +1.3
Raw Impact +1.9
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.2
Net Impact
-8.3
1st pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 245 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 2th
2.9 PPG
Efficiency 3th
39.7% TS
Playmaking 62th
3.3 APG
Rebounding 11th
1.8 RPG
Defense 47th
+7.1/g
Hustle 12th
+5.1/g
Creation 64th
+3.26/g
Shot Making 1th
+2.37/g
TO Discipline 28th
0.07/min

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Paul has posted negative impact in 100% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 0% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.

Average defender. Paul doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.

Performance has dropped off. First-half impact: -6.8, second-half: -9.8. Worth watching whether it's fatigue, injury, or opponents adjusting.

In a rough stretch — 16 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 16 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 21 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

C. Gillespie 21.2 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
D. Mitchell 15.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 2
W. Clayton Jr. 13.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Howard 13.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Konchar 11.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 3
A. Caruso 11.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Alvarado 10.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Jaquez Jr. 10.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 3
T. Proctor 8.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Goodwin 8.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

C. Gillespie 17.4 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 5
D. Mitchell 17.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 4
D. Smith 15.5 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 4
J. Howard 9.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Konchar 9.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
Q. Grimes 8.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
L. McNeeley 8.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Wiggins 8.6 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 2
T. Jones 8.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
T. Proctor 7.9 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.38
PTS 3

SEASON STATS

16
Games
2.9
PPG
1.8
RPG
3.3
APG
0.7
SPG
0.0
BPG
32.1
FG%
33.3
3P%
50.0
FT%
14.2
MPG