2025-26 Season
CARIS LEVERT
2025-26 Season
CARIS LEVERT
PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology
TEAM COMPARISON
of 15 teammates (10+ games, 10+ min)
Similar Players
Same position, closest production profile this season.
SKILL DNA
Percentile rank vs 245 Guards with 10+ games
THE SEASON SO FAR
Caris LeVert’s early season was defined by a maddening tug-of-war between high-level secondary creation and brutal offensive stagnation. Too often, he ground the second unit to a halt with forced isolation attempts and poor shot selection. Look no further than his 12/03 vs MIL appearance, where a disastrous 1-for-10 shooting performance and a stubborn insistence on contested deep looks cratered his value to a -15.3 impact score. Sometimes, his own mistakes ruined perfectly good shooting nights. During his 12/06 vs MIL outing, he hit 3 of 5 shots for 11 points, yet still posted a -4.1 impact because a brutal string of turnovers entirely erased his scoring efficiency. However, when he abandoned the hero ball and leaned into his defensive instincts, he became a genuine two-way weapon. On 11/24 vs IND, LeVert erupted for 19 points and a +6.9 impact score by fueling the transition game with aggressive point-of-attack defense and perfectly timed gambles in the passing lanes. To survive in this rotation, he must stop hijacking possessions and start trusting the flow of the offense.
An agonizing offensive identity crisis defined this brutal mid-season stretch for Caris LeVert. The wheels completely fell off during a disastrous 12/22 vs POR matchup, where an abysmal 0-for-8 shooting night and forced drives resulted in a -5.1 impact score. Even when his jumper actually connected, hidden costs routinely dragged his value into the gutter. Take the 02/25 vs OKC contest as a prime example. He scored 9 points on an efficient 3-of-6 from the floor, but getting continually lost on switches created massive defensive liabilities that tanked his overall impact to a brutal -7.0. He occasionally managed to keep his head above water without filling the stat sheet, like his +1.7 impact mark on 02/03 vs DEN. During that outing, a meager 4-point output was salvaged by high-energy hustle (+3.2) and stout defensive rotations (+5.0) that stabilized the second unit. Ultimately, stagnant isolation possessions and a glaring reluctance to challenge primary defenders turned his minutes into a severe net negative.
A brutal offensive slump characterized by stagnant isolation play and forced jumpers routinely stalled the second unit during this frustrating stretch for Caris LeVert. Even when his shot actually fell, hidden costs tanked his value. Look at Mar 17 vs WAS, where he scored 10 points on highly efficient shooting, but a barrage of ill-timed half-court turnovers dragged his impact score down to a disappointing -6.2. The floor completely fell out on Mar 13 vs MEM. During that disastrous outing, a wretched 2-for-10 shooting performance and broken perimeter execution resulted in a catastrophic -20.7 impact mark. He occasionally found ways to salvage his minutes without scoring, as seen on Mar 20 vs GSW. Despite a miserable 5-point outing on 2-of-9 shooting, his relentless diving for loose balls and passing lane disruption generated a stellar +8.2 hustle rating to secure a +1.9 overall impact. Unfortunately, those flashes of gritty utility were rare exceptions in a deeply damaging run of basketball.
IMPACT TIMELINE
Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.
Struggling. LeVert has posted negative impact in 82% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.
Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 39% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.
Defensive difference-maker. LeVert consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.
Small downward trend. First-half impact: -4.3, second-half: -6.2. Not alarming yet, but trending the wrong direction.
Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 4 games. Longest cold streak: 14 games.
MATCHUP HISTORY
Based on 57 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.
ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM
His shooting stats against each primary defender this season
ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED
How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.
SEASON STATS
GAME LOG
61 games played
Don't miss tomorrow's analysis
GET YOUR TEAM'S BREAKDOWN
Free daily analysis with Net Impact player ratings. Delivered every morning after your team plays.
Create Free AccountAlready have one? Log in