LAC

2025-26 Season

BRADLEY BEAL

LA Clippers | Guard | 6-4
Bradley Beal
8.2 PPG
0.8 RPG
1.7 APG
20.1 MPG
-7.4 Impact

Beal produces at an poor rate for a 20-minute workload.

Share Post Reddit Facebook LinkedIn WhatsApp
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-7.4
Scoring +6.4
Points 8.2 PPG = +4.5
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.9
Creation +0.7
Creation 1.7 AST/g = +0.7
Turnovers -3.7
Turnovers 1.5/g = -3.7
Defense -0.9
Defense 0.5 STL, 0.0 BLK = -0.9
Hustle & Effort +0.6
Rebounds 0.8 RPG = +0.6
Raw Impact +3.1
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.5
Net Impact
-7.4
4th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

Similar Players

Same position, closest production profile this season.

MIL MIL
Cole Anthony
8.0 PPG -7.2
UTA UTA
Walter Clayton Jr.
7.7 PPG -7.4
BKN BKN
Ben Saraf
7.9 PPG -6.6
DAL DAL
Ryan Nembhard
7.5 PPG -6.4

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

Best Game
12 PTS vs PHX
Nov 09 | +0.5 impact
Worst Game
5 PTS vs PHX
Nov 07 | -15.5 impact
PATTERNS

Struggling. Beal has posted negative impact in 83% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 20% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.

Defensive impact is minimal for a 20-minute player. Not generating enough contests, rim protection, or forced turnovers to move the needle.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 6 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

G. Allen 43.3 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 5
D. Booker 23.4 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 6
J. Fears 20.8 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 2
R. O'Neale 18.0 poss
FG% 16.7%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 3
K. George 16.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
P. Larsson 12.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 3
N. Powell 9.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Mitchell 7.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
C. Gillespie 6.9 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 1.3
PTS 9
T. Murphy III 6.3 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.48
PTS 3

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

G. Allen 43.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 8
R. O'Neale 20.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Booker 13.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 4
T. Murphy III 13.6 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.44
PTS 6
S. Mykhailiuk 13.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.45
PTS 6
D. Mitchell 12.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 2
J. Fears 10.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.47
PTS 5
D. Brooks 10.6 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 3
N. Powell 10.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.5
PTS 5
R. Dunn 7.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

SEASON STATS

6
Games
8.2
PPG
0.8
RPG
1.7
APG
0.5
SPG
0.0
BPG
37.5
FG%
36.8
3P%
75.0
FT%
20.1
MPG

GAME LOG

6 games played

Nov 09 vs PHX
+0.5
12pts 0r 3a 4/9 FG 2/4 3P
Nov 07 vs PHX
-15.5
5pts 1r 1a 2/14 FG 1/5 3P
Nov 04 vs MIA
-7.2
12pts 1r 2a 5/8 FG 2/4 3P
Nov 01 vs NOP
-9.8
9pts 1r 2a 3/8 FG 1/2 3P
Oct 24 vs PHX
-2.9
6pts 1r 2a 2/4 FG 0/0 3P
Oct 22 vs UTA
-9.3
5pts 1r 0a 2/5 FG 1/4 3P