UTA

2025-26 Season

BLAKE HINSON

Utah Jazz | Forward | 6-8
Blake Hinson
11.9 PPG
2.4 RPG
1.1 APG
20.4 MPG
+0.8 Impact

Hinson produces at an average rate for a 20-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+0.8
Scoring +11.7
Points 11.9 PPG = +8.6
Shot Making above expected FG% = +3.1
Creation +0.3
Creation 1.1 AST/g = +0.3
Turnovers -0.8
Turnovers 0.4/g = -0.8
Defense -0.4
Defense 0.4 STL, 0.1 BLK = -0.4
Hustle & Effort +1.9
Rebounds 2.4 RPG = +1.9
Raw Impact +12.7
Baseline (game-average expected) −11.9
Net Impact
+0.8
57th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 234 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 65th
11.9 PPG
Efficiency 98th
68.4% TS
Playmaking 26th
1.1 APG
Rebounding 10th
2.4 RPG
Defense 17th
+4.7/g
Hustle 15th
+7.6/g
Creation 9th
+1.25/g
Shot Making 65th
+6.98/g
TO Discipline 99th
0.02/min

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Hinson's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~7 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 54% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Hinson locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: -1.3, second-half: +2.9. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 14 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

V. Krejčí 20.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 2
J. Sims 18.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Walker 13.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 3
A. Gill 12.5 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.72
PTS 9
Z. Williamson 12.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
G. Santos 12.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Reese 11.0 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.64
PTS 7
J. Fears 9.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
W. Riley 8.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Queen 8.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

V. Krejčí 16.1 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 5
J. Reese 16.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 2
J. Sims 15.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.39
PTS 6
G. Santos 14.6 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 3
S. Bey 14.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.35
PTS 5
J. Walker 11.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
B. McGowens 10.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
B. Portis 10.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
P. Nance 9.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Gill 8.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

SEASON STATS

14
Games
11.9
PPG
2.4
RPG
1.1
APG
0.4
SPG
0.1
BPG
51.3
FG%
46.8
3P%
75.0
FT%
20.4
MPG