IND

2025-26 Season

BEN SHEPPARD

Indiana Pacers | Guard | 6-6
Ben Sheppard
7.1 PPG
3.0 RPG
1.8 APG
21.4 MPG
-5.3 Impact

Sheppard produces at an poor rate for a 21-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-5.3
Scoring +6.0
Points 7.1 PPG = +4.3
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.7
Creation +0.3
Creation 1.8 AST/g = +0.3
Turnovers -1.5
Turnovers 0.6/g = -1.5
Defense -0.6
Defense 0.6 STL, 0.1 BLK = -0.6
Hustle & Effort +1.9
Rebounds 3.0 RPG = +1.9
Raw Impact +6.1
Baseline (game-average expected) −11.4
Net Impact
-5.3
22th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 245 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 29th
7.1 PPG
Efficiency 79th
58.6% TS
Playmaking 28th
1.8 APG
Rebounding 53th
3.0 RPG
Defense 15th
+4.7/g
Hustle 53th
+9.2/g
Creation 10th
+1.37/g
Shot Making 22th
+4.60/g
TO Discipline 89th
0.03/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

A brutal, extended perimeter slump defined Ben Sheppard's first twenty games, turning the swingman into a spacing liability who routinely bogged down the half-court offense. He occasionally salvaged his minutes by playing the ultimate low-usage glue guy, best seen on 10/25 vs MEM. Despite scoring a modest 9 points, Sheppard generated a +3.0 impact score in that contest by flawlessly executing defensive rotations and securing crucial loose balls. Unfortunately, those gritty efforts were largely buried under a mountain of outside bricks. On 10/26 vs MIN, an absolute offensive cratering resulted in a staggering -17.5 impact score because he failed to hit a single outside attempt. Even when he produced relatively high offensive totals, hidden mistakes often ruined his overall rating. During the 11/28 vs WAS matchup, he chipped in 9 points on highly efficient shooting alongside 5 assists, but mistimed defensive gambles completely unraveled his connective play and left him with a -1.5 impact score.

Extreme offensive passivity and erratic perimeter shooting defined this miserable twenty-game stretch for Ben Sheppard. He offered a fleeting glimpse of two-way brilliance on 12/03 vs DEN, posting a +11.1 impact score while starting and hitting all five of his field goal attempts for 14 points. That flawless performance quickly evaporated into a prolonged slump filled with empty minutes. During a brutal bench stint on 01/12 vs BOS, his -9.3 impact score was entirely earned through relentless perimeter bricklaying, as he shot a dismal 1-for-6 from deep while failing to convert drive-and-kick opportunities. Things bottomed out completely on 02/03 vs UTA. Handed 29 minutes as a starter, he dragged the rotation down with a disastrous -15.3 impact score. Even though he managed 8 points in that contest, his inability to navigate defensive screens and a frustrating refusal to assert himself offensively destroyed his overall value on the floor.

Extreme volatility defined Ben Sheppard’s mid-season stretch, as the wing vacillated wildly between lethal spot-up efficiency and damaging perimeter slumps. When his jumper was dialed in, he looked like an elite role player, earning a +9.1 impact score on 02/19 vs WAS. He poured in 15 points on a pristine 6-for-8 shooting clip in that start, using flawless spot-up execution to fuel a massive box score boost. Yet, when his shot abandoned him, his value cratered entirely, even when he managed to reach double figures. During an ugly -10.3 impact showing on 02/24 vs PHI, Sheppard scored 12 points but severely damaged the offensive flow by clanking a heavy volume of perimeter jumpers on 4-for-12 shooting. He did occasionally find ways to tilt the floor without forcing the issue, as seen on 03/17 vs NYK. Despite scoring just seven points off the bench, he posted a stellar +8.2 impact by utilizing relentless off-ball movement and perfect 3-for-3 shot selection to create high-value opportunities for the second unit.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Sheppard has posted negative impact in 82% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 51% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive impact is minimal for a 21-minute player. Not generating enough contests, rim protection, or forced turnovers to move the needle.

In a rough stretch — 4 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 10 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 64 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

L. Kennard 77.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 6
D. Robinson 65.6 poss
FG% 14.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.03
PTS 2
L. Ball 53.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 6
C. McCollum 49.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.06
PTS 3
K. Knueppel 42.0 poss
FG% 16.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
D. Garland 40.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
I. Quickley 34.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
B. Ingram 34.4 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.09
PTS 3
A. Simons 33.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
T. Maxey 32.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 5

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

D. Robinson 84.5 poss
FG% 26.7%
3P% 18.2%
PPP 0.14
PTS 12
C. McCollum 63.3 poss
FG% 36.4%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 8
L. Kennard 51.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 7
D. Garland 48.4 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.21
PTS 10
L. Ball 48.4 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 14
K. Knueppel 41.8 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 12
K. Huerter 36.6 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 6
D. DiVincenzo 36.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 6
C. Williams 35.2 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 4
J. Shead 34.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

SEASON STATS

65
Games
7.1
PPG
3.0
RPG
1.8
APG
0.6
SPG
0.1
BPG
43.4
FG%
36.2
3P%
76.5
FT%
21.4
MPG

GAME LOG

65 games played