NYK

2025-26 Season

ARIEL HUKPORTI

New York Knicks | Center | 7-0
Ariel Hukporti
2.2 PPG
3.0 RPG
0.5 APG
9.4 MPG
-6.1 Impact

Hukporti produces at an poor rate for a 9-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-6.1
Scoring +2.0
Points 2.2 PPG = +1.7
Shot Making above expected FG% = +0.3
Creation +0.2
Creation 0.5 AST/g = +0.2
Turnovers -1.7
Turnovers 0.6/g = -1.7
Defense -0.5
Defense 0.2 STL, 0.5 BLK = -0.5
Hustle & Effort +3.2
Rebounds 3.0 RPG = +3.2
Raw Impact +3.2
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.3
Net Impact
-6.1
6th pctl vs Centers

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 93 Centers with 10+ games

Scoring 6th
3.3 PPG
Efficiency 9th
51.5% TS
Playmaking 23th
0.9 APG
Rebounding 24th
4.3 RPG
Defense 19th
+3.7/g
Hustle 70th
+20.3/g
Creation 16th
+1.60/g
Shot Making 10th
+1.98/g
TO Discipline 32th
0.06/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Ariel Hukporti’s early season was defined by offensive invisibility and wildly erratic stretches of defensive anchoring. His glaring limitations were immediately exposed during a start on 10/22 vs CLE, where he surrendered a brutal -9.4 impact score by allowing constant dribble penetration that compromised the entire defensive scheme. Even when he managed to score with perfect efficiency, hidden costs dragged him down. During his 12/05 vs UTA appearance, a flawless 4-point shooting stint was completely erased by frontcourt defensive lapses, resulting in a -3.8 impact. Too often, he operated strictly as an empty screen-setter who offered zero gravity, allowing opponents to completely ignore him in the half-court. Yet, he occasionally found ways to tilt the floor without filling up the basket. On 12/18 vs IND, he tallied just 4 points but generated a +2.2 impact score because he finally anchored the interior with massive defensive energy and relentless hustle plays.

Ariel Hukporti’s mid-season stretch was defined by wild swings in usage, oscillating between dominant physical rebounding and completely invisible spot minutes. When given a spot start on 01/02 vs ATL, he absolutely bullied his way to 16 rebounds and 8 points in 28 minutes, generating a massive +14.7 impact score through sheer physicality and second-chance generation. He brought that same bruising energy off the bench on 02/03 vs WAS, posting a +5.2 impact score by utilizing hard rolls to the rim and excellent hands in traffic to score 12 points. Even when his scoring vanished, his massive frame often created immense non-box-score value. During a 15-minute stint on 02/22 vs CHI, he managed just 4 points but still registered a stellar +5.3 impact score because his exceptional rim deterrence completely disrupted the opposing second unit. Yet, his floor remains dangerously low when his fundamentals slip. On 02/27 vs MIL, a brief six-minute appearance yielded a -2.1 impact score because his inability to set solid screens completely bogged down the half-court offense.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Hukporti has posted negative impact in 87% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Hukporti locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 2 games. Longest cold streak: 13 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 75 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

J. Huff 66.4 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 3
O. Okongwu 28.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
R. Kalkbrenner 23.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Sharpe 23.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
N. Richards 20.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 2
I. Stewart 19.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 2
I. Jackson 18.9 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 3
E. Mobley 17.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
W. Carter Jr. 17.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 2
K. Ware 16.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

J. Huff 50.1 poss
FG% 27.3%
3P% 11.1%
PPP 0.14
PTS 7
O. Okongwu 27.6 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.36
PTS 10
D. Sharpe 26.6 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
R. Kalkbrenner 23.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 4
I. Jackson 22.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
E. Mobley 18.7 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.37
PTS 7
I. Stewart 18.6 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.38
PTS 7
P. Reed 17.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 2
P. Siakam 17.7 poss
FG% 22.2%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 5
N. Richards 17.4 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 5

SEASON STATS

53
Games
2.2
PPG
3.0
RPG
0.5
APG
0.2
SPG
0.5
BPG
56.2
FG%
25.0
3P%
78.8
FT%
9.4
MPG

GAME LOG

53 games played