UTA

2025-26 Season

ANDERSSON GARCIA

Utah Jazz | Forward | 6-7
Andersson Garcia
5.2 PPG
8.4 RPG
2.8 APG
33.8 MPG
-0.7 Impact

Garcia produces at an average rate for a 34-minute workload.

Share Post Reddit Facebook LinkedIn WhatsApp
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-0.7
Scoring +2.3
Points 5.2 PPG = +1.6
Shot Making above expected FG% = +0.7
Creation +0.5
Creation 2.8 AST/g = +0.5
Turnovers -3.1
Turnovers 1.4/g = -3.1
Defense +1.0
Defense 1.6 STL, 0.8 BLK = +1.0
Hustle & Effort +9.5
Rebounds 8.4 RPG = +9.5
Raw Impact +10.2
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.9
Net Impact
-0.7
48th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

Similar Players

Same position, closest production profile this season.

IND IND
Jeremiah Robinson-Earl
5.4 PPG -1.1
CLE CLE
Dean Wade
5.9 PPG -1.6
POR POR
Matisse Thybulle
5.9 PPG -1.6
ORL ORL
Goga Bitadze
6.2 PPG -0.0

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

Best Game
7 PTS vs MIL
Mar 19 | +11.2 impact
Worst Game
3 PTS vs SAC
Mar 15 | -7.5 impact
PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Garcia's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~2 points per game.

Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 20% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.

Defensive difference-maker. Garcia consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: -3.6, second-half: +1.2. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 5 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

M. Raynaud 30.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. DeRozan 19.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
B. Portis 16.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
K. Kuzma 16.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
K. Anderson 15.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Avdija 14.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 4
J. Sims 12.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 1
D. Cardwell 11.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
P. Achiuwa 10.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 3
J. Ingles 9.9 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 2

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

M. Raynaud 19.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 2
B. Portis 16.5 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 4
D. Plowden 14.8 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 3
K. Kuzma 14.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
K. Anderson 14.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.42
PTS 6
D. DeRozan 12.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 2
K. Hayes 12.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
P. Achiuwa 12.0 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 4
O. Dieng 10.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 3
J. Randle 10.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 2

SEASON STATS

5
Games
5.2
PPG
8.4
RPG
2.8
APG
1.6
SPG
0.8
BPG
31.0
FG%
7.7
3P%
77.8
FT%
33.8
MPG

GAME LOG

5 games played

Mar 19 vs MIL
+11.2
7pts 11r 6a 3/6 FG 0/2 3P
Mar 18 vs MIN
-0.1
4pts 8r 3a 1/5 FG 0/2 3P
Mar 15 vs SAC
-7.5
3pts 11r 3a 1/7 FG 1/6 3P
Mar 13 vs POR
-7.5
6pts 3r 2a 2/6 FG 0/3 3P
Mar 11 vs NYK
+0.3
6pts 9r 0a 2/5 FG 0/0 3P