PHI

2025-26 Season

ADEM BONA

Philadelphia 76ers | Forward | 6-10
Adem Bona
4.8 PPG
4.3 RPG
0.4 APG
17.4 MPG
-4.4 Impact

Bona produces at an below average rate for a 17-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-4.4
Scoring +4.0
Points 4.8 PPG = +3.5
Shot Making above expected FG% = +0.5
Creation +0.5
Creation 0.4 AST/g = +0.5
Turnovers -1.8
Turnovers 0.8/g = -1.8
Defense -0.3
Defense 0.4 STL, 1.2 BLK = -0.3
Hustle & Effort +4.5
Rebounds 4.3 RPG = +4.5
Raw Impact +6.9
Baseline (game-average expected) −11.3
Net Impact
-4.4
22th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 234 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 13th
4.8 PPG
Efficiency 76th
60.3% TS
Playmaking 1th
0.4 APG
Rebounding 54th
4.3 RPG
Defense 12th
+4.4/g
Hustle 53th
+12.7/g
Creation 60th
+2.65/g
Shot Making 10th
+2.65/g
TO Discipline 57th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Adem Bona's opening stretch was defined by a chaotic tug-of-war between his game-wrecking defensive energy and severe offensive limitations. On 10/22 vs BOS, his complete offensive invisibility severely handicapped his lineup, resulting in an abysmal -8.6 impact score despite logging just 15 minutes. Yet, he could completely flip a game without ever looking at the basket. He generated a massive +5.8 impact on 10/28 vs WAS by relying entirely on elite rim protection and relentless hustle to swing the momentum while scoring just two points. When Bona stayed within his limits, his verticality and bone-crushing screens created immense value as a defensive anchor for the second unit. He finally put both ends together on 11/28 vs BKN, pairing his usual defensive intensity with explosive rim-running to post 13 points and a +7.4 impact. However, when he fell into constant foul trouble—like the missed rotations that dragged him to a -4.8 impact on 12/23 vs BKN despite perfect shooting efficiency—his floor time became a massive liability.

Adem Bona’s midseason stretch was defined by extreme volatility, oscillating wildly between game-changing interior presence and unplayable defensive liability. When his motor ran hot, he was a massive disruptor off the bench. Take the 01/20 vs PHX matchup, where he bullied his way to 11 points and 10 rebounds, generating a massive +7.2 impact through elite rim protection and hyper-efficient finishing. Even when he barely scored, his sheer physical exertion could swing momentum. On 01/14 vs CLE, he tallied just 6 points in 11 minutes but still posted a stellar +5.6 impact by maximizing his floor time with constant hustle and relentless energy. Yet, when his defensive discipline evaporated, the hidden costs were disastrous. During the 01/05 vs DEN game, he managed an efficient 8 points but dragged the team down with a brutal -6.0 impact because his interior defense completely collapsed, resulting in a staggering -6.7 defensive score. Ultimately, his effectiveness hinged entirely on his willingness to do the gritty defensive work rather than merely hunting easy dump-off passes.

A volatile tug-of-war between terrifying rim deterrence and maddening positional lapses defined Adem Bona's mid-season transition into a starting role. He was an absolute wrecking ball on 02/03 vs GSW, generating a massive +14.2 impact score in just 16 minutes by pairing 11 points with violent paint protection that completely flipped the game's energy. That physical dominance often vanished. Despite missing only one of his three shots for 7 points on 02/09 vs POR, he bled out a brutal -6.7 impact because severe defensive bleeding and blown coverages entirely erased his clean interior finishing. He eventually learned to dictate games without needing offensive touches. During a heavy 33-minute assignment on 03/14 vs BKN, Bona managed only 9 points but secured 10 rebounds and a +6.0 impact simply by anchoring the paint with terrifying verticality. When he embraces disciplined positioning, he alters the geometry of the court, but his tendency to rack up quick fouls still keeps his nightly value on a razor's edge.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Bona has posted negative impact in 76% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 69% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Bona consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: -5.9, second-half: -2.8. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

In a rough stretch — 4 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 12 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 69 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

E. Mobley 68.2 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 10
K. Towns 54.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.04
PTS 2
O. Ighodaro 43.7 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 4
C. Murray-Boyles 41.9 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4
M. Robinson 40.9 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 3
N. Claxton 40.4 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4
K. Filipowski 39.7 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 9
D. Wolf 38.6 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 7
R. Kalkbrenner 38.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.03
PTS 1
O. Okongwu 38.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

E. Mobley 71.8 poss
FG% 58.8%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 24
K. Towns 49.1 poss
FG% 63.6%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.41
PTS 20
K. Filipowski 46.7 poss
FG% 12.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 6
N. Claxton 41.2 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 8
O. Ighodaro 40.7 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 8
C. Murray-Boyles 39.5 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4
M. Robinson 39.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 5
R. Kalkbrenner 36.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 4
I. Hartenstein 36.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 4
M. Bagley III 35.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2

SEASON STATS

72
Games
4.8
PPG
4.3
RPG
0.4
APG
0.4
SPG
1.2
BPG
59.3
FG%
33.3
3P%
71.3
FT%
17.4
MPG

GAME LOG

72 games played